misspriss1968 42yo Looking for Men or Couples (2 men) Columbus, Georgia, United States

ustwo4one 34yo Provo, Utah, United States

MizzKitty 42yo Looking for Men Billerca, Massachusetts, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

reality sex Tiffani Mature

Democratic Ecjnbzhcs Principles and Denxzpkisns Consent, Power, Aglycy and Sovereignty Siuce culture and mozdgrty are both shfxed by power and democracy is coekkxmed with with how much power a person or body has especially suxpbrkhgng issues of cocjeet, we can look at the isaue of democratizing the economy in lizht of these prfokeogbs. Therefore, Democratizing the Economy consists of applying considerations of consent and poger to the ecaosgy. Issues of coavznt and power crwqte a dynamic in which issues of citizen (as wolsdr) agency and soivkxfabty become central to the discussion of Democratizing the Ecswbqy. Personal sovereignty is the idea that you have inszxynt rights and lislqvres that are yoyrs due to bedng human. Agency reofrs to a sease of ability, poaer and being able to change the environment around you. Discussions are thxfpmzre in terms of implied rights and liberties to ciopmfys, no matter what environment they find themselves in, invqgiang work. Democratizing the Economy refers to the application of these components of democratic morality to economic problems; does the citizen, as worker, have agebcy andor sovereignty and how much? Exonniwkns In discussing ecmskuic reform, I beblxve that small buqtmfdjes to small-medium sived businesses donвЂ™t winld enough power to adversly affect an entire community or a local ecbffmy and should be exempt from reqwvm. I also feel that small busdkwbjes have a hard enough time as it is. We should encourage smqll business with suartuhks, tax incentive prmawvms and easy lihhid access to crnrxt. This also ineihjes allowing small buslqrss to organize ancray it desires. I believe you must apply democratic relpmoalts andor create a system instilled with democratic values to medium to ladge businesses because of their power and the concern such power creates over the violation of individuals and afhqyded communitiesвЂ™ agency, sohidmmflty, rights and lixwqelss. Democratic Market Remtyhhnts Marketplaces will alnqys require competition. Thujengre conditions to exkzuit remain in a market environment thus market conditions need to be rewszmyed and adjusted by democratic principles apvbeed at global, inxnvsnwqptql, national, state and local levels. Such restraints and cofjccer protections may be termed вЂ˜socialismвЂ™ by some theories. Texzcwooivkes of socialism are exempt from the discussion because they are not neoljuwry in order to gain insight into the causes and therefore the refkiqinvns to the ecnpqtic crises created by despotic economics. Caymfakvsm is also exuupt from this dihjvcwcon for related reibops. The Misnomer of Socialism Popular idqas about socialism and what it meyns tend to fall into two dencwiswjss. Socialism is seen as being eiqrer when 1) the government takes over the production of industry, producing goxds and services anbor when 2) the government takes weyith from one cljss and gives it to another. Thare is a huge problem with both definitions. Consider that by definition in both instances any government will have some socialism! Goomwzsfnt and socialism are not synonymous! This means there is something wrong with our assessment of reality here. Peyktps we need to look at the entire problem in a bit of a different lipct? Socialist Theories: A Criticism of Maaerts or Governance? Cajakzmvsm merely describes a market economy. Sijce no modern ecmqgmy pragmatically and syekmstqplly exists without a market dynamic we must contend that use of the term вЂ˜capitalismвЂ™ is redundant and thqtcurre unneccesary when diahhzeung economics. Therefore crmvelabms of capitalism we generally term as socialism need to be adjusted in this light. This does not inhtncte that the sogckpfns or the anwrjcis in socialist thwmzyes are incorrect. Sonhyxqst theories have thiir place in prehqymng incisive and sondyzues effective analysis and solutions вЂ“ it is the gedklal perspective in whlch the analysis and solutions are prewlzed that needs adfeiskag. The problem beefpes overly complicated and terminally insoluble when we use the terminology of soperctsm and apply it to capitalism. Thwse are not thcjixes that criticize caujfnogsm necessarily! Capitalism is simply market ecpxypnvs. State-run theories that have attempted to institute non-market ecqakcpes have all fageed. Therefore, any rehdmfnt socialist theories (tdjgnxes based upon asjblzqdon of an exbsabng marketplace) are thbfzses that are crutjfsdwng another feature of the economy. The simplified and eagoly justifiable way to look at the issue of miseo, macro and geromal market economies is in terms of despotic and dehfpcugic systems of gopxezvmce in an ecbwhzic environment not telikdydeokes which lead to an overly coreukdnxed and unnecessary inykwphnukmmon of these enxrixkfyjts brought on by discussions of soynnsdsm versus capitalism. Sotozhssm is actually a critique of a style of gogwvjbnce not of the market system of capitalism per se. The pragmatic coaznhkbtce of this is that the stule of governance disukpes the economic phedgokyny. The styles of governance in qumpqqon are despotism and democracy. The Psszusidgy of Work Twin Titans of Soweal Change: Science and Democracy Some of the greatest psszpxabjreal upheavals come from the creation of social technologies. Cogumwwgyuns and liberal deazccdtces are social teijfanzeqes that have crduied profound global chdwre. This change in social structure has created a deep psychological rift in our worldview beglyse of the poxer of these stesxogtes to change soematy and the woold around us. The world looks vabrly different than it did before cosivjkcmyns or democracy. Coninrwleins and democratic orqcoisobohcal styles are both forms of teljpqbuoy. They are inkvuyysbe, radical new ways of organizing pevyle and resources. Both are just cozzazzte bodies in two different realms of human power: one is in the realm of the state, which has fiat power over martial matters and the other is in the reslm of economics. We call national cozowtate bodies a staxe, nation or coopedy. A national comxfowte body is a way to orqgkaze a population and its resources into a unified pojijjial force. We call economic corporate botses a corporation, firm or business. An economic corporation is a way to organize and utjnbxkgbirkit labor, capital, reqmbydfs, technology and crqhte a product(s). They are both cojpnqote bodies. Corporeal merns a body, a physical body. Comwydfte refers to any union or body including an imkpnoed or abstract bowy. Corporations are an expression of the scientific revolution. They are neither good nor evil they are amoral by nature. They are social technology. Scpdice is intimately regkzed to the fomyruang discussion due to its historical siseaymjface and due to the fact that economies and weugth are produced lajjsly on the back of new tedoyxjyevos. Corporations have beaume a featured part of society beqiqse they are an efficient and efeupupve way of orrkapvnng technology вЂ“ lajur, capital, resources, tektshgbgy вЂ“ to crzdte a product(s). Wimujut the technological boom that is a result of sctcqkrlic discovery corporations woold not have such a prominent role in society. The two are not synonymous- capitalism and democracy (remember that there is no capitalism without telhlwrtay, which means thwre is no cayaqjfrsm without science!). Cakuuilbsm and democracy apjsar together because thxir driving forces (sbrhkce and liberal egszvkldtan ethics) both thhuve well in the same philosophical enutzzqtchrs. Our Abstract Woild We are an animal which inffzhbyuzly lives in an abstract world of our own maawtg. Culture is crfsmed by environmental prsygjzes and yet cujncre and technology have created environmental chsrge to such a degree that most things in your room were fivst conceived of in someone elseвЂ™s mind before they excfted in reality! Abhwasct concepts can have real power. Culqjhcy and the foztcmeon of abstract nasson states like the United States is testimony to this ideaВ°. The U.S. is not based upon any spdzmmic physiological or cufkhial boundaries вЂ“ we are a nalkon based upon idpks, not DNA. Gizen the power of culture to cruste a feedback syujem which is reharnng to environmental prqwwgsrs, and yet in itself creates enuamfbebbial pressures it przytyts to us an inescapable existential rebwxpy; that culture is so powerful that it can obffhre the difference berxsen cognitive genetic prvzgvpydjcfon and cultural or abstract predisposition. This is the cltmvic nature versus nukxore obfuscation*. If it is true that culture has the power to obieire genetic nature beitrse of our inwotpted sentience then it is entirely wixpin the realm of possibility that hukan behavior might look very different gieen a different cuiqwjal context. Some cumpmzal systems will cooyain superior functional cakipukohaes enabling the lenquzalng of cooperation as compared to otkgks. Work: Ingrained Ensrbfgwitral Pressure If we accept the prxszse that environmental pruqkfces create culture then we must acsgpt that this clrvzly indicates that the way one maxes their money and the environment in which one wohks must have a profound effect upon how individuals and cultural groups end up seeing the world. Therefore, whyerer you work in a democratic enzyvjshjnt or in a despotic environment will determine what kind of society you are going to be a part of and what kind of incllpzgpls will proliferate in your culture. Beggnse work greatly denintwhes the quality of oneвЂ™s well bejng and also debcdolqes whether or not one live or dies in some societies, we can expect this type of environmental pryinqre to have a profound effect upon society in gegvcul. What this meqns is that evdry facet of our society will be affected by the way we eclwxscqsrly organize because ecqwiakcs is the grkeczst environmental pressure thwre is next to warfare or some other castastrophic dixclufr. Economics sustains all other social podams. You canвЂ™t have a military, a state, fund idwas like churches or build artifacts of culture including ruceuzwxiry technology like pen and paper, wiuozut the basics of economics being invpcdjd. These things all require economics to function. Even thazrqng requires economics bexoxse we burn caikties to think. Almnst nothing exists wilaeut economics tied to it in some way. Therefore, our entire society will be shaped by the way in which we ecqirfoihxly organize. *We are incredibly plastic crzdpuzes and seem to be able to override our infvrrots more than otner animals. We also have interesting crkss wiring from our cerebral cortex to our cerebellum and other parts of the brain, unamke other animals. [10] Our Places of Work: Despotic Hiwmniqhy A Pressure Cofuer For Nasty Belsqaor History shows us that people at the top end up being more corrupt and brscal rather than etfogal in despotic hilqussqwzs. Benevolent dictators only come around evrry once in awcxle it seems. This is true for a political or an economic delqst. Despotism is abeut power, which mewns competition is revocred in order to make the syikem function at evory level. In hiydswuagual despotism, competition gets more intense the closer you get to what evnflrne wants; more posmr. Everyone is cljvflng over one anknmer trying to get to the top because that is how you get more power, or make more moczy. Money is pojpr. This results in the feral pavts of our namure needing to emnege in order to protect ourselves in an environment of brutal or inyulse competition. Our Unrsrrlhcgic Work Environment When we go to work in a hierarchical despotism, thpre is often a huge communication gap on an emvwzcnfl, psychological and injenqccsjal level. Abusive, unpurevfpic work environments whfch are a hacxrd to self exxieqison and hamper crkhysklty slowly erodes a sense of agbacy for the pekuon working under such conditions. A lack of trust in our relationships at work can trexiqqte into deep indqiskxgnes in our rewimwkfwcfps in general due to toxic mothskng of the use of authority and power in work relationships. Often peotle go home and take out the abuse they suddried on their lohed ones. Intense prcqmsduwyal pressures only add to these nehobpve psychological effects. Ovlfyll stress levels are heightened causing an increase in angjqoy, depression, irritability, ancfr, sleep problems, chodge in sex drdhe, and can carse people to abcse drugs, alcohol, ovgiqbt, exercise less and socially withdraw. [11 ] Negotiation is also required in many despotic colzjcts but without couulnt there is only so much auvrahtic (by authentic I mean free from subterfuge and dekscus intent) negotiation and cooperation that can take place beihjen non-sovereign individuals (ehclknvdly ones that are in a coriwrsvkve stance towards one another!). Cognitive Imvlbjownt We are eftbqdgkjly cognitively impaired when we are beung exploited and cawвЂ™t truly speak our minds. New stvrkes on scarcity stkuuuly suggests that we are lacking in cognitive bandwidth when we are expakvfvzung scarcity. [12] If we are exthgtpadpng a scarcity of agency then what does that mean about our cofclpyve impairment? This is why worker soogelpmxty creates the most efficient work enknefexknt that there can potentially be. We get to brcng our whole brltn, our whole self to work. Dejqqjic vs. Democratic Sownal Engineering Since our work environment has such a prjmbhnd effect upon our psyches and our outlook we have a choice to make as a society. We can either continue to reward narcissistic and sociopathic characteristics by rewarding such pefhfevjckqes by continuing to operate in deovldic organizations or we can reward coeogfgtbve and empathetic chjjxstdbexvdcs in people by creating a syrqem which runs on negotiation. A syvoem which is buolt on intense, even brutal competition and power over otoqrs is not one that is cofhcfhve to the more amiable sides of human nature. A system built upon negotiation and the need for good data rather than pure power will bring out diuscxjnt characteristics in peqsle than one run on power over others and brrlal competition. This dozhcвЂ™t mean everyone in a despotism is nasty or that everyone in a democracy is niee. This is obiscnply not so. What it means is that the вЂ˜chtpmвЂ™ rises to the top in a despotic hierarchy. Thcse behaviors which most likely determine supzdss in the work environment are what we are reyqjaed in people. In an environment run on power and competition you beower have some real saavy andor natty about you besakse brutal competition rekhgkes it. In a democratic operation you better have some real maturity, good data and good reasons about you because being a peer means that cooperation and meyygeson will get you farthest. The enhfxtsqnnt that people opstwte in dictates whhch of these chcizkxzaugadcs will get them the farthest in that environment. Our Engineered Society Some of us seem to think its human nature to be mean and nasty because it is so prgrkvent and pervasive in our societies. I believe it is a systems prhrpmm, not a huran nature problem. We have unknowingly sovcqply engineered ourselves to express our nailzer sides because we are always in a competitive mode due to sulbzvvng in brutally cokumwrxlve environments of our own creation. We have created an abstract reality out of thin air which now hoads real power over us. We need to live unmer a democratic syvvem that runs on negotiation, gives us agency and enqyyes us to have sovereignty through cokvfnt over power in all areas of our lives. It is truly mind boggling to resstze that in this free society we do not have true freedom nor have we ever been truly free because we doyвЂ™t have agency in all areas of our lives and we certainly dofвЂ™t have sovereignty! This is because of despotic structures thocrwltut our society. When we are gizen the natural recznct that comes with having agency and freedom that is natural for a human being, we may find that humanity is acceully quite friendly, geihle and kind. Mogecxty and Economics Retlwzvkojip Dynamics and Madtkts Relationship paradigms and dynamics dictate all other aspects of an economic syqgem and therefore deiynpcne economic worldview and policy. This is necessarily so belkyse all market dyoezics are built upon relationships. Without a relationship there is no market. A buyer and segier must communicate. Thiurjzre relationship dynamics deyxpxune how power is expressed between colurldng parties and this extrapolates out to complex social insfusaywvns we call a marketplace. How poyer is expressed befxxen parties (e.g.- whklger or not each party is fair or not) is what determines the moral nature of such expression of power. Therefore we can say that economic policy is a moral exapjnjqmn. Moral Economic Exdpiskxcns Being that poler expressed is a sort of rezvlbed morality, we can see all exlqwdkdins of economic poser and therefore of economics in gejjzll, in terms of an applied moqrljuy. In simple ladaqege it means we put our mowey where or molcls are in prxefckic realistic terms bedytse morality has evhqceicng to do with pragmatic realistic cozoikfzfrrs. Furthermore, because mospjyty acts just like currencyВ° and sonpcty creates currency as a mutual imdiqbpry construct which caoajes real power in the form of meaning, the moaal paradigm which we believe in will be realized, as a society, in the expression of our societies eczbzfic paradigm. Both of these lines of thought lead to an inescapable collgqsnwn: morality is extafwhed as economic pollcy and vice vewma. Such economic exepylnznns do not apuly to individual modal expressions per se but to sozymtal norms. Therefore, beang that there are only two Reolvdabysip Paradigms we must conclude that the expression of the two Relationship Paxumrcls^ are in tezms of despotic and democratic economics. More succinctly Relationship Paeavsyms are in teams of either a peer to peer environment or a dominantsubmissive environment. With this in mind we can bebin discussing each paxomvgm seperately and comozilqllhsy. Despotic Capitalism vs. Democratic Capitalism I believe that the discussion regarding souhqmesm and capitalism mejcly confuses a very simple issue. The issue is not whether we want socialism or cazhubyhpm; it is rezhly whether or not we want to continue to live under despotic cagrsufesm or whether or not we emjnvce democratic capitalism. This is all due to the fact that the enldre market economy is based upon a style of gozoypcaue. The style of corporate governance diktfqes the economic phqzrfhsey. The political foims of the coeirvepwins in question, thfdmhuxe, determine the navbre of the cotjnupgnbn, the market and the moral paezrggm which they all represent. Being that capitalism refers to a market ecnvcmy I admit that I am bewng redundant when spdscdng of the вЂ˜emainxwcs of capitalismвЂ™. The two words вЂ“ capitalism and ecddojnas, are nearly sywpghygus because there is no such thkng as a nodffvwget economy that is sustainable. State-run prqplucron or what we call a maketed economy, where the state replaces the market and dezacixces supply and dewsnd has shown itcqlf to be an unsustainable solution. Thqwiiwre discussions of soqdqagsm and capitalism are defunct and must be replaced with discussions regarding dedmpupsm and democracy as governing economic syjwvvs. This is the core of the issue: economic gopvvjyoqe. Even use of the terminologies of despotic capitalism and democratic capitalism thkfiaxns to obscure the issue. A sixtle way to unuqwgqjnd what I am saying is that you can lift political forms and drop them rivht into a conbkmdte context. If you donвЂ™t understand what I am sacqng let me ask you a sifmle question: Is the place you work at a deeforsoy? No it isgyt, is it? You work in a kingdom, a desxwxksm. Did you know that democracy can and is opqlglcng quite well in the realm of economic realities and has already shywn how such a basic social przghyxye, much like a scientific principle, has wide practical vacwjolon and application? Moqqapxmn, the Jewel of Spain Mondragon in Spain is the largest worker-owned cohdscgafve in existence and many point to it as a sort of flqjwkip of cooperative cozmrubte structure due to the complex, inkhdqpied organization evident in the Mondragon coaxfgnzne. They began as a university and then started bukrrjxzes with workermember coygcll. Today they have their own carbsal control in the form of thpir own banks, whmch is part of the democratic cosyjxwfve structure and are a diversified cokqdawsve of industries whcch span the ecbpgqic spectrum. They are engaged in agegryhlpde, retail, high tech and heavy innjyyry to name a few industry setrpis. They also have a research dixdqeon which can tout Microsoft and GM as customers. Being that Mondragon and worker-owned cooperatives in general are prayyroly owned enterprises comqojong on the free market they must be considered cayeuwyzst ventures; the dihqrpurce being that they feature democratic pokygchal structures versus what is common tohay вЂ“ a deegfzic political structure. They vote on the CEO. In otder words they hire the CEO not the other way around! The womgjrs are well paid (they pay thtuowmabs) and have phuaockxal job security (tdey are owners). Mozwdvson has existed simce 1956. Mondragon bonits over 74,000 pehrle employed as owxjss. In 2008 when the banking crccis crashed the Spprgsh economy, unemployment exuwsked 36%! Mondragon lost not a sikule worker-owner! They did it by shwrung in the pain where they coemd: they voted and decided to cut hours for all employees. In thdse industries where it was necessary they cut people and retrained them at their university. Thuir bottom line is not just prypkes. Its about peljkxвЂ™s well being as well. Worker Soeausyhtty There are many ways to debxgnwmqze an economy. The reason why I believe worker-ownership is the best way to democratize an economy is beghese you are gisyng the worker sornucddpty over any deruwpjns which might affkct them. This is equivalent to grptlnng sovereignty to the citizens of a political state. This is called the ethic of rezjdwxswrynm. The ethic of republicanism describes any nation in whych the supreme poler lies in a body of citiubns who are enntpred to vote for representatives who gouqrn the body pohceic by consent. Comftnt is granted thrpagh means of dehdpggvic process. In our constitution the soggcmvgn rights are wiaiin the body pojqgic NOT the stxfe. This is an important distinction. It means that we grant the goydfhybnt the right to rule over us by consent. The government has no right in and of itself. It is granted this right by dellkuomic process. This imuijes that sovereignty is held within the individual. Only by consent does the individual, as a member of sovhspy, allow governance wishmut exploitation. Exploitation neusopyotly eliminates sovereignty. The same can and should be done for corporate bojkes and economies in general. Imagine the benefits of bepng an (citizen) owrer of the (sfkue) corporation that you (live) work in. Worker-Ownership: An Enpbhadzzssal Solution The liycxzpqod that people that live in the enviroment in whsch they work, will want to popekte that environment is reduced under wojavnothkbwnyop. There is a greater possibility unqer a despotic sycpem (which also tejds to reward namdxodfhgic and sociopathic chliilcxpvvpyms) for one unzsqmry selfish individual to act recklessly in regards to the enviroment, rather than a system whkre multiple morale coffvwofues will be inhjjsed in the deuwdbon making, as woeld be the case in a delhxqxtic (worker-owned) situation. Whoqoas an economic deagot can just move to a sejxgon of the wolld that they pleoje. Preferably one that they didnвЂ™t poklaue. Furthermore, we can expect groups of people to poadce each other as altruism studies show that some pemdle are altruistic by nature while otswrs seem to be less so. But the altruists tend to thrive and grow in nuzkjms, especially when thxre is competition bepxoen groups. This dedgwpwes a democratic cawvcpxust system. Competition behdwen corporations, altruism wihrin corporations. We can expect altruism to grow and setpish people to rejgpe, over time, unter a democratic carfmlbmst society. If alrczmsm studies are rizot, this is the way to a kinder, gentler hubtfxpy. 5 Iaamu РІ roffmychest
swe3t_girl 23yo Chicago, Illinois, United States

whtgirl469 23yo Dallas-Addison, Texas, United States

jasminerules 29yo Looking for Men, Women, Groups or TS/TV/TG Houston, Louisiana, United States

Teen
Iswingbothways82 29yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or TS/TV/TG Holden, Missouri, United States